The UN Human Rights Office in Central Asia is deeply concerned about Khairullo Mirsaidov’s imprisonment, noting that journalist’s harsh sentencing highlights grave concerns for freedom of expression in Tajikistan.
In a statement released on July 16, the UN Human Rights Office in Central Asia notes that Mirsaidov’s imprisonment could severely intensify the stifling of journalistic activity in the country.
“The extremely harsh and blatantly disproportional sentence against journalist Mr. Khairullo Mirsaidov is yet another sign of an increasingly dire situation for the freedom of expression in Tajikistan,” said Mr. Ryszard Komenda, Head of the UN Human Rights Regional Office in Central Asia.
Over the past several years, Tajikistan’s authorities have reportedly accumulated a track-record of aggressive prosecution of independent journalists, human rights activists and lawyers for merely speaking out and pursuing their professions. This has led to wide-spread self-censorship and closure of independent news outlets, among other consequences.
The outcome of Mr. Mirsaidov’s trial is reportedly just the latest manifestation of this trend and moves Tajikistan even further from implementing the numerous recommendations it has received from the UN’s human rights mechanisms. In his 2016 visit, the Special Rapporteur on the promotion and protection of the right to freedom of opinion and expression recommended that Tajikistan strongly condemn the alleged harassment of journalists and noted that “without protection from violence and harassment of judicial authorities, it is impossible for journalists to perform their central role in providing public access to information in the country.
The UN Human Rights Office calls upon Tajikistan to uphold its international human rights commitments, including those made during its 2016 Universal Periodic Review before the UN Human Rights Council to “ensure the freedom of expression, association, assembly and freedom of religion in accordance with international human rights norms.” Tajikistan should review Mr. Mirsaidov’s sentence in order to ensure a trial outcome that is in coherence with the gravity of the alleged offence, says the statement.
