Tajik human right activists initiate discussions on cooperation against practice of torture

DUSHANBE, February 19, 2011, Asia-Plus — The Dushanbe Office of the Institute for War and Peace Reporting (IWPR) jointly with local human rights activists initiate discussions on the strategy of cooperation against the practice of torture in the country. According to the IWPR Dushanbe Office, two consultative meetings with participation of lawyers and representatives of […]

Mavjouda Hasanova

DUSHANBE, February 19, 2011, Asia-Plus — The Dushanbe Office of the Institute for War and Peace Reporting (IWPR) jointly with local human rights activists initiate discussions on the strategy of cooperation against the practice of torture in the country.

According to the IWPR Dushanbe Office, two consultative meetings with participation of lawyers and representatives of human rights organizations and media outlets are expected to take place this month.

The events are held by the IWPR Dushanbe Office in cooperation with two human rights organizations, namely; Independent Human Rights Center (Sergey Romanov) and Nota Bene (Nigina Bahriyeva).

“The main objective of these consultative meetings is in acquainting journalist community with instruments for correct coverage of issues related to rights of prison inmates and persons under investigation,” the IWPR Dushanbe Office director Abdumalik Qodirov said.

The first consultative meeting is scheduled to take place in Khujand on February 21 and the second one is expected to take place in Dushanbe on February 25.

“We want to discuss problems facing lawyers during defending victims of torture and share experience on this subject,” said the Nota Bene chairperson Nigina Bahriyeva, “We will also consider how lawyer and human rights activists could coordinate their activities to defend concrete persons and tackle the system problems.”

Local experts say consider that despite a number of prosecutions, the legal system in Tajikistan is still failing to adequately address the continuing use of torture in detention.  According to them, courts continue to base convictions on confessions obtained under duress, and victims are reluctant to lodge complaints. Experts consider that one of reasons for this impunity is current legislation, which contains an unclear definition of torture.

We will recall that in a statement released on June 26, 2010 to mark International Day in Support of Torture Victims, Tajikistan’s Bureau for Human Rights and Rule of Law (BHR) recommended that the authorities introduce a separate legal article defining torture as a specific crime and establish effective mechanisms for investigating every complaint.

Join us on social media!

Article translations:

Related Article

Оби зулол
Оби зулол

Most Read

Recent Articles

Money from thin air: how Tajikistan can earn millions from carbon projects

The idea of creating a carbon market in Tajikistan is becoming relevant in the face of global climate challenges and the need to adapt...

European Union-supported digital transport system launched in Tajikistan

It provides transport companies with a secure and integrated environment

Tajik agency clarifies pilot tax project involving electronic wallet transactions

The agency explained that the pilot project is aimed at identifying systematic unregistered entrepreneurial activities.

Tajik boxers will qualify for the 2028 Olympics in new weight categories

The upcoming Games will feature full gender equality for the first time.

Tajikistan approves $25 million renewable energy action plan for 2026–2027

The main part of the funds will go towards solar power plants, small hydroelectric power stations, and the electrification of remote villages.

Kazakh, Turkish authorities agree to produce ANKA drones at joint venture in Kazakhstan

An agreement on this was signed in Astana during the visit of Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan.

Pension payments suspended for more than 14,000 people in Tajikistan over lack of re-registrationIn

The authorities reported that these pensioners did not complete re-registration. What should they do?