DUSHANBE, January 3, Asia-Plus — Hearing of case of three female reporters for the Dushanbe tabloid newspaper
Ovoza
(Rumors) is expected to resume on January 4.
However, Saida Qurbonova, the former editor of
Ovoza
, is not sure that hearing will resume tomorrow. According to her, it may be postponed again.
We will recall that a court in Dushanbe’s Firdavsi district is considering case pitting Tajik singer Raihona Rahimova against the Dushanbe tabloid newspaper
Ovoza
. The singer filed the suit against the newspaper claiming that an article published in
Ovoza
allegedly
defamed her.
Hearing of the case began on October 10 2007 and has been repeatedly postponed since that time.
Three female reporters for
Ovoza
, Farangis Nabiyeva, Muhayo Nozimova, and Saida Qurbonova, face charges of insult, libel and illegal collection and spread of information about private life.
Farangis Nabiyeva and Muhayo Nozimova coauthored the article critical of singer Raihona Rahimova titled “Raihona pi-pi-pi Afghoniston” (Ovoza, # 25, June 21, 2007).
Raihona lodged an application to the Dushanbe city prosecutor’s office on July 11, claiming the article by Muhayo Nozimova and Farangis Nabiyeva had allegedly defamed her. Following the application, the Dushanbe prosecutor’s office instituted criminal proceedings against them and the
Ovoza
editor Saida Qurbonova.
The journalists released an open letter to President Emomali Rahmon on August 20, asking to intercede on their behalf after the Dushanbe prosecutor’s office formally initiated criminal libel case against them for “insulting” a singer. They argued that their joint article critical of Raihona Rahimova published in
Ovoza
did not constitute grounds for instituting criminal proceedings. They defended the singer’s right to defend her honor, dignity, and business reputation, but said that the issue would be better settled by a civil court.
Researchers with the Institute of [Tajik] Language and Literature of the Academy of Sciences – Sayfiddin Nazarzoda, Sayfiddin Mirzoyev and Ghiyosiddin Qodirov, who carried out the linguistic examination of the article critical of Raihona Rahimova, concluded that it does not contain elements of insult.
