Kyrgyzstan’s Constitutional Court rejects president’s proposal to reinstate death penalty

Kyrgyzstan's Constitutional Court has ruled that President Sadyr Japarov’s proposal to reinstate the death penalty for especially grave crimes, including the murder and rape of children, is unconstitutional. The decision was announced on December 10, following a review of the draft law. In an official statement, the court concluded that the initiative “does not comply […]

Asia-Plus

Kyrgyzstan's Constitutional Court has ruled that President Sadyr Japarov’s proposal to reinstate the death penalty for especially grave crimes, including the murder and rape of children, is unconstitutional.

The decision was announced on December 10, following a review of the draft law.

In an official statement, the court concluded that the initiative “does not comply with the Constitution, is inadmissible, and legally impossible.”

“The draft law ‘On amending the Constitution of the Kyrgyz Republic’ cannot be submitted to a referendum. All procedures related to its implementation must be terminated upon the entry into force of this ruling,” the statement said.

Japarov's initiative was prompted by the brutal murder of 17‑year‑old Aisuluu Mukasheva in September 2025 — a case that sparked national outrage.

 

Death penalty ban is a core Constitutional and international principle

The court emphasized that the right to life and the abolition of the death penalty are fundamental values enshrined in the Constitution and reflect Kyrgyzstan’s commitment to a legal system that excludes capital punishment.

“The ban on the death penalty is not just a legal norm — it reflects the nation’s moral and legal direction,” the ruling noted.

The court also reminded that Kyrgyzstan is a party to the Second Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which mandates total and permanent abolition of the death penalty and offers no withdrawal mechanism.

Reinstating capital punishment, the court warned, would put Kyrgyzstan in breach of its international obligations and undermine the constitutional principle of adherence to international law.

Article translations:

Related Articles

Оби зулол

Most Read

Join us on social media!

Recent Articles

Digital transformation of Tajikistan: from online services to a new economy

Governments across the world are entering a critical phase of digitalisation. Citizens want faster, simpler, and more transparent services, while businesses and investors want...

Trump announced a 10-day ceasefire between Israel and Lebanon. Beirut reported initial violations by Tel Aviv.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu stated that Israeli troops will not be withdrawn from the occupied territories of Lebanon.

Tajikistan Capital Day: When Will It Be Celebrated and What Events Will Take Place?

The Dushanbe City Hall has prepared an extensive program of events in honor of the holiday.

Tajik athletes won gold, silver, and bronze at the 2026 Asian Championship

For the first time in history, two Tajik judokas faced each other in the final of this championship.

When Fire, Sun, and Water Were Gods. On the History of Zeravshan and the Treasures of the Gold-Bearing Valley

How did the Sogdians live, what was the secret of their creative energy, and which gods did they worship?

India-Tajikistan Deepen Strategic Partnership as Fifth Foreign Office Consultations

Expand Cooperation Agenda India and Tajikistan have once again reaffirmed...