Government heads from CIS states to set up working group for reforming CIS

DUSHANBE, May 25, Asia-Plus — Agenda of a May 25 meeting of the council of the CIS prime ministers in Dushanbe was in the center of discussion at a meeting of President Rahmonov with visiting CIS Executive Secretary Vladimir Rushailo in Dushanbe on May 24.  “Government heads from the CIS countries will discuss a progress […]

DUSHANBE, May 25, Asia-Plus — Agenda of a May 25 meeting of the council of the CIS prime ministers in Dushanbe was in the center of discussion at a meeting of President Rahmonov with visiting CIS Executive Secretary Vladimir Rushailo in Dushanbe on May 24. 

“Government heads from the CIS countries will discuss a progress of implementation of resolutions adopted at the CIS summit in Kazan on August 26, 2005,” Vladimir Rushailo told journalists following his meeting with President Rahmonov.  According to him, it is planned to set up a working group for consideration of conceptual issues of reforming the CIS institutional bodies.  “At present the CIS is acting in three directions – economic, cooperation, stability and security, expansion of cultural cooperation,” Rushailo noted.  

Asked about the possible withdrawal of Georgia, Ukraine and Moldova from the CIS, Rushailo noted that there were legal documents determining such procedures and “we have not yet received official applications for outing the CIS from anybody.”  

Answering questions about other organizations grouping the post-Soviet countries, the CIS executive secretary noted that GUAM (Georgia, Ukraine, Azerbaijan and Moldova) was mostly aimed at development of transportation-communications infrastructure, the Eurasian Economic Community (EAEC) was an economic club dealing with economic cooperation, and the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) dealt with security problems.  “The CIS has all these components and efficiency of the CIS should be determined by heads of states that made up it,” Rushailo said.

Join us on social media!

Article translations:

Related Article

Оби зулол
Tenisi
Оби зулол

Most Read

Коммерсбонк Точикистон

Recent Articles

President of Tajikistan instructed to develop measures for stabilizing the cement market within a week

Despite the increase in the production of this building material in the country, the domestic market faced a shortage, supply disruptions, and a sharp rise in the price of the building material.

Gusty winds and mudslides damage houses, roads, and cars in Dushanbe and some other regions

At least 9 vehicles were damaged, including three in Dushanbe and six in Vahdat.

The US struck military facilities in Iran. Trump expressed dissatisfaction with Tehran’s proposals and threatened Oman.

Earlier, Iran's state TV reported receiving a draft unofficial framework agreement between Tehran and Washington to settle the conflict.

How much did Tajikistan’s budget earn from the “Google tax”?

The law is already 5 years old, but the Tax Committee provided data only for the last 2 years.

The bilateral trade between Tajikistan and Iran increased by 8% in Q1 2026

Another meeting of the joint intergovernmental commission of the two countries took place in Dushanbe.

Russia and Taliban government sign military-technical cooperation agreement

The document may open up opportunities for the exchange of weapons, military technologies, and other types of defense cooperation.

“Hit with fists on the lower back and abdomen.” A teacher from Nurobod, claiming he was beaten by a student’s brother, details the attack

According to him, he is being threatened with murder, and law enforcement agencies have not yet detained the attacker.

International internet starts coming back in Iran after long shutdown 

Western media reports says Iranians ​isolated by a long...

Tajikistan listed among countries with low generative AI usage

Among the Central Asian countries, Kazakhstan has the highest rate.

Prices in Tajikistan rise almost 2% in January-April: apples, fuel, and utilities become particularly more expensive

In April, inflation was 0.6%: food products became more expensive, non-food products increased in price comparatively less, and tariffs for paid services remained unchanged.